Subject	The ratios are 4.08, and 3.67, so if you divide them out,
Posted by	zellamay on November 10, 2011 at 2:52 PM
	This message has been viewed 130 times.
In Reply To	Re: It's math. Compare gear ratios to get a rough posted by sonnymarton on November 10, 2011 at 11:52 AM
Message	(3.67/4.08) you get .89, call it .9 . So if you are getting 20 mpg now, multiply 20 by .9 to get 18. So you will lose about 2 mpg (20 compared to 18). This is not exact, of course.
Follow Ups	tt swap to na differential - sonnymarton 20:59:48 11/09/11 Re: tt swap to na differential - sonnymarton 21:30:29 11/09/11 everything - thumper 23:02:54 11/09/11 Re: everything - sonnymarton 23:10:18 11/09/11 ZIP - MidLifeZ (DFW) 06:25:57 11/10/11 Re: ZIP - sonnymarton 07:19:53 11/10/11 It's math. Compare gear ratios to get a rough - zellamay 08:07:10 11/10/11 Re: It's math. Compare gear ratios to get a rough - sonnymarton 11:52:35 11/10/11 The ratios are 4.08, and 3.67, so if you divide them out, - zellamay 14:52:25 11/10/11 and losing 2 MPG is way worth it for - MidLifeZ (DFW) 07:19:21 11/13/11 and losing 2 MPG is not worth it for - zellamay 13:01:31 11/13/11 It has more to do with the efficiency of the engine... - -Grimm- 14:15:12 11/13/11 Disagree. Far and above, the 2 biggest factors in mileage - zellamay 16:37:09 11/13/11
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.